Thanks for the suggestion @aninda_bitm I will give it a try

I would think. That's not an odd score. May need

1.7 far better than what I am getting around 20

Really........ Actually with DNN i got 1.7300 on LB without any hyperparameter tunning and any other adjustment. The score with CNN is not that good at all compare to DNN.

Really........ Actually with DNN i got 1.7300 on LB without any hyperparameter tunning and any other adjustment. The score with CNN is not that good at all compare to DNN.

The CNN architecture, optimizer, and learning rates had to be changed to finally end at 1.8 on LB. So there is room for improvement using CNN.

BTW anyone tried out removing the low-quality images, if so what was the best LB score you have? for me, it was around 1.81 based on the starter notebook.

Great...... Like i said before my CNN didn't give me good score while my DNN did very well (1.7300 on LB) even though am yet to change/adjust my optimizer and learning rate respectively if that would further improve the score. For me removing low-quality images worsen my score on LB. I mean removing "low-quality images" have no positive effect on my score at all.