It seems the additional audio files (the previous, and current) are mp3 encoded, while the original audio files are wav encoded. Reading mp3 files with a popular package like librosa is slow compared to reading wav files and therefore creates a bottleneck during model training. I want to believe we're allowed to convert the files to wav format?
'/%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cpath fill='%23fff' d='M-120-80h240V80h-240z'/%3e%3cpath d='M-120-80h240v48h-240z'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23060' d='M-120 32h240v48h-240z'/%3e%3cg id='b'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' stroke='%23000'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' fill='%23fff'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23b00' d='M-120-24v48h101c3 8 13 24 19 24s16-16 19-24h101v-48H19C16-32 6-48 0-48s-16 16-19 24z'/%3e%3cpath id='c' d='M19 24c3-8 5-16 5-24s-2-16-5-24c-3 8-5 16-5 24s2 16 5 24'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3cg fill='%23fff'%3e%3cellipse rx='4' ry='6'/%3e%3cpath id='d' d='M1 5.85s4 8 4 21-4 21-4 21z'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='scale(-1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='scale(1 -1)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
It seems the additional audio files (the previous, and current) are mp3 encoded, while the original audio files are wav encoded. Reading mp3 files with a popular package like librosa is slow compared to reading wav files and therefore creates a bottleneck during model training. I want to believe we're allowed to convert the files to wav format?
Yes, you can convert mp3 to wav.
Thanks, is it just a compilation of the two first datasets, or we have new utterances or cleaning of the two first datasets?
I think it is news because the number of samples are differents
oh, looks like. Didn't read the word "batch". thanks
It looks like the new nlp_keywords_29Oct2020.zip sound files are in exactly the same format as AdditionalUtterances.zip. Please confirm.