Zimnat Insurance Recommendation Challenge
 scale(.21174)'%3e%3cpath d='m52.487 177.086 13.018 11.852 11.762-11.762 11.896 12.266 12.846-11.358 11.827 12.43 13.339-11.013 10.897 12.728 13.27-10.145 13.947 12.319'/%3e%3ccircle cx='89.425' cy='154.584' r='5.167'/%3e%3ccircle cx='111.237' cy='156.047' r='5.167'/%3e%3ccircle cx='30.05' cy='16.5' r='4'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Helping Zimbabwe
$5 000 USD
Completed (over 5 years ago)
Prediction
Collaborative Filtering
1777 joined
612 active
Start
Jul 01, 20
Close
Sep 13, 20
Reveal
Sep 13, 20
Disparity in occupation codes
Connect · 29 Aug 2020, 20:37 · 2
Good day people,
I would like to pick your beautiful brains on the treatment of the disparity on occupation codes. It appears there are 233 unique values on train dataset and only 187 in test. I have also gone further to make enumerations which revealed 9 appear in test but not in train and 55 in train dataset but not in test. This means we have a total of 64 unique instances not found in both datasets.
is this is with other feature too because
It seems to be only perculiar to occupation codes. With sex it was an issue of case difference which I think is neglible in terms of effect.