Hi there, are we allowed to assume the image location is available at test time or is this part of the meta data that we should not use?
If you check the submission csv the location (top-left-right) is there. However, I'd be careful since if you check some examples, many are not correctly labeled. Also if you want to use the extra images, these have no location information.
Thanks for the input! I saw that they said we can't use any of the meta-data provided and was wondering whether the location field falls under that.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23001489' d='M0 0v6h9V0z'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23e03c31' d='M0 0v3h9V0z'/%3e%3cg stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='2'%3e%3cpath id='d' d='m0 0 4.5 3L0 6m4.5-3H9'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' stroke='%23ffb81c' clip-path='url(%23c)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' fill='none' stroke='%23007749' stroke-width='1.2'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
If you check the submission csv the location (top-left-right) is there. However, I'd be careful since if you check some examples, many are not correctly labeled. Also if you want to use the extra images, these have no location information.
Thanks for the input! I saw that they said we can't use any of the meta-data provided and was wondering whether the location field falls under that.